Making IPOs More Accountable: A Balancing Act?

Uncategorized

The year 2021 has been a bumper period for the Indian primary market. A total of 63 companies collectively raised Rs 1.2 lakh crore through initial public offerings which was a record performance for any calendar year in Indian stock market. The investors participated vehemently in majority of these IPOs despite the monetary policy taking a hawkish turn and covid19 adding one more variant Omicron into its family. Many of the top IPOs of the year 2021 are trading below the list price yet there are some others who have sailed through.

In the midst of the IPO rush, a concern was raised regarding the appropriate pricing of the Issue in the light of the need to strike a proper balance between the issuer’s aspirations and investor’s interest. SEBI expressed an opinion that the merchant bankers need to engage with a wider set of potential investors. This was followed by some major changes in the IPO Rules to fix the gap between the expectations of the issuers and the interest of the potential investors.

SEBI seems to have decided to tighten the IPO Rules in an attempt to tackle the regulatory gaps and extreme stock price volatility. Some major changes are likely to be effected in the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations and SEBI (LODR) Regulations as discussed below:

Changes in Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP)

(a) Objects of the Issue:

If an the issuer company has set out an object for future inorganic growth in its offer documents but it has not identified any acquisition or investment  target,  the  amount  for  such  objects  and  amount  for general corporate purpose (GCP) shall not exceed 35% of the total amount being raised.

Further, if the  issuer company  has  not  identified  acquisition  or  investment  target,  as mentioned in objects of the issue in the draft offer document and the  offer  document,  the  amount  so  earmarked  for  such  objects  shall  not  exceed  25%  of  the  amount  being raised by the issuer.

However, no such limits shall be applicable if the proposed acquisition or strategic investment object   has   been   identified   and   suitable   specific disclosures about such acquisitions or investments are made in the offer document at the draft and final stages.

(b) Conditions for Offer for Sale (OFS)

In the case of an offer for Sale (OFS) to public in an IPO where Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) is filed by issuer without track record; if the selling shareholders, individually or with persons acting in concert, hold more than 20% of pre-issue shareholding of the issuer, they shall not be able to offer more than 50% of their pre-issue shareholding and if they hold less  than  20%  of  pre-issue shareholding of the issuer, the OFS shall not exceed more than 10% of pre-issue shareholding of the issuer.

This is a move away from the existing norms where large shareholders can sell their entire shareholding through the OFS route. The  restrictions are being brought about in order to avoid a possible crisis of confidence among retail investors if there is a complete exit of the promoters in cases where the companies do not have any track record.

(c) Monitoring of the IPO spends

Credit  Rating  Agency  (CRAs)  registered  with  SEBI,  shall henceforth  be  permitted  to  act  as  Monitoring  Agency  instead  of Scheduled   Commercial   Banks   (SCBs)   and   Public   Financial Institutions (PFI). Further, such a monitoring shall continue till 100% utilization of issue proceeds (increased from the present requirement of 95%). In addition, the amount raised for general corporate purpose (GCP) shall also be brought under monitoring and utilization of same shall be disclosed in monitoring agency report and the monitoring agency report shall be placed before audit committee for  consideration “on  a  quarterly  basis”  instead of  “on an  annual basis”.

Changes in the Price Band in a Book Built Issue

In case of book built issues, a minimum price band of be at least 105% (At present it is 120%) of the floor price shall be applicable for all issues opening on or after notification of this rule in the official gazette.

Lock-in for Anchor Investors

The existing lock in of 30 days shall continue for  50%  of  the  portion  allocated  to  anchor  investor  and  for  the  remaining portion, lock in of 90 days from the date of allotment shall be applicable for all issues opening on or after April 01, 2022.

Revised allocation methodology for Non-Institutional Investors (NIIs)

In the case of a book built issues opening on or after April 01, 2022, one  third  of  the  portion  available  to  NIIs  shall  be  reserved  for applicants with application size of more than two lakh rupees and up to ten lakh rupees and two  third  of  the  portion  available  to  NIIs  shall  be  reserved  for applicants with application size of more than ten lakh rupees:  The basis of allotment of securities in case of NII category shall be on ‘draw of lots’ much on the same lines as currently  applicable for  retail  individual  investors  (RIIs)  category.

Changes in Conditions of Preferential Issue

In the case of all preferential issues where relevant date is after the notification of proposed changes in the official gazette, the following factors shall be considered for determining the floor price for all preferential issues:

(a) Frequently  traded  security

The  floor  price  for  preferential issue  shall  be  higher  of 90/10 trading days’ volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the scrip preceding the relevant date or as per any stricter provision in the Article of Association of the issuer company.

(b) Infrequently  traded  security

The  valuation  report  by  a registered independent valuer shall be required for pricing the Issue.

(c) Change in Control cases

An  additional  requirement  for  a  valuation  report  from  a  registered independent  valuer shall  be  required  in  case  of  change  in  control/ allotment of more than 5% of post issue fully diluted share capital of the issuer company to an allottee or to allottees acting in concert. Further,  a  committee  of  independent directors  shall  be  required  to  provide  a  reasoned  recommendation along  with  their  comments  on  all  aspects  of  preferential  issuance including  pricing.  The voting pattern of the committee shall also be disclosed to shareholders/public.

(d) Lock-in Provisions for Promoter holdings 

The lock-in requirement for promoter holding for allotment up to 20% of the post issue paid up capital shall be reduced to 18 months from the existing 3 year and for allotment exceeding 20% of the post issue paid up capital it shall be reduced to 6 months from the existing 1 year.

(e) Lock-in Provisions for Non-Promoter holdings 

The lock-in requirement for allotments for Non-promoters shall be reduced from 1 year to 6 months.

(f) Conditions for Pledge of the Shares locked-in pursuant to a Preferential Issue

Promoters would be permitted to pledge the shares locked-in pursuant to a preferential issue provided if pledge of such specified securities is one  of  the  terms  of  sanction  of  the  loan  granted  by  certain  financial institutions and the said loan is to be sanctioned to the issuer company or  its  subsidiary(ies)  for  the  purpose  of  financing  one  or  more  of  the objects of the preferential issue.

(g) Preferential Issue for Consideration other than Cash

Consideration for preferential issue, “other than cash” shall be permitted only for share swaps backed by a valuation report from an independent registered valuer.

(h) Timelines  for  seeking  in-principle  approval  from  Stock  Exchanges  by Issuer Company

Issuer company shall necessarily apply for in-principle approval from stock exchanges on the same day as the date of dispatch of notice for AGM/ EGM to shareholders.

New IPO Rules: A Balancing Act

Indian Primary Market is already considered as a heavily regulated Market. The new pricing rules will further tighten the measures that are resorted to by the market regulator to achieve the twin objective of safeguarding the investors’ interest on one hand and to provide for more transparent, resilient, stable and secured financial markets on the other hand. In a nutshell, the regulator is simply trying to enhance the checks and balances in the matter of funds raised through IPOs, OFS and Preferential Issues and the utilization thereof.